ACRO Single Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 2:  Adam PYZIK - POL

Ranking Index = 22,41

 Puchar Polski, Lotnisko Przylep, 25-29.08.2020
Judges nation High value
Panel average Low value
 Advanced - Power, Programme 1: Free Known
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Posi No RI / FP J-rank Diff
1 Wojciech GRZECHOWIAK - POZ 9,0 8,0 7,0 8,5 8,5 8,5 7,5 7,0 8,0 7,0 8,5 0 2649,1 3 -2
  Extra 330LX SP-UTA 8,40 7,66 6,31 8,30 8,07 8,26 7,14 6,61 7,35 6,95 8,07   2648,9    
2 Rafał PRZYBYLAK - AZL 9,0 8,0 8,5 8,5 7,0 7,0 8,0 7,5 7,0 7,5 8,0 0 2621,6 4 -2
  Extra 330LX SP-UTA 8,40 7,66 7,88 8,30 7,17 6,95 7,72 7,13 6,31 7,38 7,77   2622,6    
3 Bartłomiej PYZIK - RAD 9,0 9,0 8,5 8,5 8,5 9,0 9,0 9,0 9,0 8,0 9,0 0 Hi 2937,1 1 +2
  Extra 300L SP-ACM 8,40 8,37 8,30 8,26 8,18 8,40 8,88 8,40 8,71 7,82 8,37   2717,5    
4 Mirosław WRZEŚNIEWSKI - POZ 8,0 7,5 7,0 8,0 7,0 7,0 7,0 8,0 7,5 6,0 8,5 0 2478,4 6 -2
  Extra 330LX SP-UTA 7,35 7,13 6,31 7,72 7,17 6,95 6,55 7,66 6,83 6,07 8,07   2556,5    
5 Maciej SMÓLSKI - RAD 7,0 7,5 8,0 8,0 7,5 9,0 8,0 7,0 8,0 6,0 8,0 0 2537,5 5
  Extra 300L N2XA 6,31 7,47 7,72 7,82 7,13 8,40 7,72 6,31 7,66 6,07 7,77   2546,7    
6 Maciej KULASZEWSKI - RAD 4,0 7,5 8,0 HZ 7,0 7,5 7,5 8,0 8,0 6,5 9,0 0 2261,4 7 -1
  Extra 300L SP-ACM 6,35 6,83 7,66 HZ 6,55 6,83 6,83 7,66 7,72 6,51 8,37   2314,5    
7 Sławomir CICHOŃ - RAD 8,5 8,5 8,0 8,5 8,5 8,0 8,5 8,0 8,5 6,5 9,0 1 Hi 2742,1 2 +5
  Extra 300L SP-ACM 8,07 7,88 7,35 7,23 7,88 7,25 CHZ 7,66 8,30 6,51 8,37   2324,4    
8 Norbert KASPEREK - CZĘ 9,0 8,5 7,0 7,0 8,0 8,0 8,0 HZ HZ 6,0 7,5 0 2122,9 8
  Extra 300L N2XA 8,40 8,07 7,38 6,61 7,35 7,35 7,72 HZ HZ 6,07 7,47   2173,3    
    0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 1 2   14
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

Judge   O/all       

23 max None HZ PZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ 1 2  
 PZ to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - -    
 PZ to Mark - -  
 HZ to Mark - -  
 Lo to Mark - 2  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

- -  

  Judge Anomalies vs. totals from all Judges

  Judge 2 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies   Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Ch.Judge Judge x2
Sławomir CICHOŃ - RAD Fig-7 HZ 8,5 HZ 7,0 HZ CHZ
Extra 300L SP-ACM   HZ HZ HZ HZ HZ  
 
Score anomalies     Judge 1   Judge 2   Judge 3   Judge 4   Ch.Judge
Bartłomiej PYZIK - RAD   2669,2 Hi 2937,1 2727,7 2604,3 2655,2
Extra 300L SP-ACM   2717,5
Sławomir CICHOŃ - RAD   2222,9 Hi 2742,1 2283,0 2377,5 2199,6
Extra 300L SP-ACM   2324,4
 
 Review of Judge Style and RI Items
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7,80, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1,63 Panel average mark = 7,48, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1,48
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
score
Bias
Hi/Lo
Panel
score
Score
difference
Judge
rank
Panel
rank
Rank
diff'ce
RI value
this pilot
Percent
of total
  RI elements ranked
  by decreasing size
Sławomir CICHOŃ - RAD Extra 300L 2679,6 Hi  2282,2 + 397,4 2 7 + 5 14,54 64,9%
Mirosław WRZEŚNIEWSKI - POZ Extra 330LX 2468,3 -   2644,5 - 176,1 6 4 - 2 2,22 9,9%
Bartłomiej PYZIK - RAD Extra 300L 2835,8 Hi  2675,3 + 160,5 1 3 + 2 2,00 8,9%
Wojciech GRZECHOWIAK - POZ Extra 330LX 2605,1 -   2738,0 - 132,9 3 1 - 2 1,62 7,2%
Rafał PRZYBYLAK - AZL Extra 330LX 2583,1 -   2690,5 - 107,5 4 2 - 2 1,33 6,0%
Maciej KULASZEWSKI - RAD Extra 300L 2294,6 -   2392,8 - 98,3 7 6 - 1 0,69 3,1%
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
score
  Panel
score
Score
difference
Judge
rank
Panel
rank
 
Maciej SMÓLSKI - RAD Extra 300L 2515,7   2558,0 - 42,4 5 5        
Norbert KASPEREK - CZĘ Extra 300L 2183,6   2184,3 - 0,7 8 8        
 
 Total RI Contribution per Nation
Judge:

max nation bias = 15,86

min = -3,85

o/all average = 1,78

Panel:

= 15,86

min = -3,85  
 
Most favoured Least favoured Average 2 x POZ 1 x AZL 1 x CZĘ 4 x RAD

Ranking Index totals per nation
using the +/- rank differences to show
national bias from the most to the
least favoured teams of Pilots

The number of Pilots in each nation
is shown with the nationality

 
Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 4.4 Build: 21.08.20