ACRO Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 1:  Edward WAASDORP - NED

Ranking Index = 2,00
 Puchar Polski w Akr. Sam. w kl. ADVANCED, Lotnisko w Toruniu, 14-18.05.2024r.
Pilot NAT = Judge NAT FPS High value FPS Low value
 Advanced - Power, Programme 3: Free Unknown #2
  HZ Anomalies Set to Panel Avg  
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
FP Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Fig-11 Fig-12 Posi No Raw/FPS J-rank Diff
1 Dariusz MAZUR - RAD 8,0 8,0 7,5 8,0 7,0 7,0 7,5 8,0 6,0 8,0 7,5 7,5 7,0 0 2352,93 1
    Extra 330LX SP-KMD 8,38 8,38 7,90 8,44 7,33 7,33 7,92 8,44 6,35 8,44 7,90 7,90 7,26   2401,28    
2 Wojciech KOTULSKI - RAD 7,5 8,0 7,5 6,5 6,0 HZ 7,0 7,0 6,5 6,5 7,0 7,0 7,0 1 2071,98 2
    Extra 330NG SP-ING 7,82 8,38 7,90 6,82 6,19 6,97 7,39 7,39 6,87 6,82 7,36 7,36 7,26   2275,45    
3 Rafał PRZYBYLAK - Ż.A 7,5 Lo 4,0 7,5 8,0 7,0 8,0 7,5 8,0 HZ HZ 7,5 7,5 9,0 1 2018,11 4 -1
    Extra 330LC SP-AUP 7,82 7,79 7,90 8,44 7,33 8,46 7,92 8,44 CHZ CHZ 7,90 7,90 9,51   2078,61    
4 Patryk OLOŚ - RAD 7,0 7,5 6,0 8,0 7,0 7,5 7,0 7,5 4,0 HZ 6,0 7,0 6,0 0 2046,58 3 +1
    Extra 330LX SP-KMD 7,26 7,82 6,19 8,44 7,33 7,90 7,39 7,92 4,26 CHZ 7,13 7,36 6,14   1973,20    
    0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0   2
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

 14 max None HZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - 2  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - -    
 HZ to Mark 1 3  
 Lo to Mark 1 1  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

 
 This Judge and O/all totals for all Judges

 

   Judge 1 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies   Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Judge x1 Ch.Judge
Rafał PRZYBYLAK - Ż.A Fig-2 Lo 4,0 8,5 8,0 8,0 7,0 OK
  Extra 330LC SP-AUP   7,79 8,21 7,98 7,51 7,48  
Wojciech KOTULSKI - RAD Fig-6 HZ 7,5 6,0 7,5 7,5 OK
  Extra 330NG SP-ING   6,97 7,20 7,08 6,28 7,33  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7,12, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1,83 Panel average mark = 7,54, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1,78
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge
FPS score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		 Rank
diff'ce		 RI value
per pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Patryk OLOŚ - RAD Extra 330LX 1973,20 -   1989,83 16,63     3     4     + 1     1,83 91,40%
Rafał PRZYBYLAK - Ż.A Extra 330LC 2078,61 -   2040,10 38,51     4     3     - 1     0,17 8,60%
                  2,00    
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
FPS score		   Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		        
Dariusz MAZUR - RAD Extra 330LX 2401,28   2328,09 73,19     1     1            
Wojciech KOTULSKI - RAD Extra 330NG 2275,45   2322,33 46,88     2     2            
 
 Summary of RI Contributions per Nation
Judge:

Max nation bias = 1,83

 Min = -0,17 Average = 0,83
Panel:

= 1,83

 = -1,50  = 0,16
 
Most favoured Least favoured Judge Avg Ż.A x 1 RAD x 3 Ranking Index totals per nation Using the +/- rank differences to show national bias from the most to the least favoured teams.

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.2 Build: 26.04.24