ACRO Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 3:  Jerzy WIŚNIEWSKI - POL

Ranking Index = 0,87
 Puchar Polski, Lotnisko w Toruniu, 05-09.05.2026r.
Pilot NAT = Judge NAT FPS High value FPS Low value
 Advanced - Power, Programme 2: Free Unknown #1
  HZ Anomalies Set to Panel Avg  
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
Post-FPS Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Fig-11 Fig-12 Fig-13 Fig-14 Posi Nmbr JrawNrm/FPS JdgRnk Diff
1 P002 8,5 8,5 8,0 8,5 8,0 8,0 6,5 8,0 8,5 8,5 8,0 9,0 8,5 8,0 9,5 0 2596,20 2 -1
    Extra 330LX SP-KMD 8,36 8,36 7,92 8,51 7,92 7,86 6,36 7,92 8,36 8,51 8,09 8,86 8,64 7,86 9,35   RiFpP    
2 P001 8,5 8,0 8,5 8,5 8,5 8,5 8,5 8,0 8,5 8,0 8,0 9,0 8,5 7,5 9,5 0 2637,26 1 +1
    Extra 300L SP-EKS 8,36 7,86 8,64 8,51 8,64 8,36 8,36 7,92 8,36 8,09 8,09 8,86 8,22 7,36 9,35   RiFpP    
3 P003 8,0 8,0 7,5 8,0 8,0 8,0 7,5 8,5 8,5 8,0 7,5 9,0 8,5 7,5 8,5 0 2525,78 3
    Extra 330NG SP-ING 7,86 7,86 7,21 8,09 7,92 7,86 7,36 8,64 8,36 8,09 7,67 8,86 8,64 7,36 8,51   RiFpP    
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0   2
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

 18 max None HZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - -    
 HZ to Mark - -  
 Lo to Mark - -  
 Hi to Mark - -  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

 
 This Judge and O/all totals for all Judges

 

   Judge 3 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies (none)  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 8,26, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1,03 Panel average mark = 8,22, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1,06
 

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.2 Build: 06.05.26