ACRO Sequence FPS Analysis for Judge 2:  Adam PYZIK - POL

Ranking Index = 0,71
 Puchar Polski, Lotnisko w Piastowie, 24-27.06.2026r.
Pilot NAT = Judge NAT FPS High value FPS Low value
 Advanced - Power, Programme 2: Free Unknown #1
  HZ Anomalies Set to Panel Avg  
 
 Raw and normalised / FPS revised Marks and Scores
Post-FPS Rank before penalties Fig-1 Fig-2 Fig-3 Fig-4 Fig-5 Fig-6 Fig-7 Fig-8 Fig-9 Fig-10 Fig-11 Fig-12 Fig-13 Fig-14 Posi Nmbr JrawNrm/FPS JdgRnk Diff
1 Maciej KULASZEWSKI - RAD 8,5 9,0 8,5 8,5 8,5 8,5 8,0 8,5 8,0 8,0 8,0 7,0 7,0 8,0 9,5 0 2695,29 1
    Extra 300L SP-EKS 8,16 8,58 8,42 8,58 8,42 8,42 8,45 8,55 7,90 7,90 8,11 7,51 7,51 8,11 8,99   2652,32    
2 Robert KOWALIK - RAD 9,0 8,5 8,0 7,5 8,0 8,5 8,0 7,5 8,0 8,0 8,0 7,5 8,0 8,0 9,0 0 2615,72 2
    Extra 300L SP-ACM 8,58 8,16 7,87 7,64 7,87 8,42 8,45 7,24 7,90 7,90 8,11 7,98 8,45 8,11 8,58   2600,83    
3 Dariusz MAZUR - RAD 8,5 8,5 7,5 7,0 8,0 8,0 7,5 7,0 8,0 8,0 8,5 7,0 8,0 8,0 7,5 0 2518,08 4 -1
    Extra 330LX SP-KMD 8,16 8,16 7,33 7,17 7,87 7,87 7,98 6,77 7,90 7,90 8,58 7,51 8,45 8,11 7,33   2566,12    
4 Maksym GRABARCZYK - WRO 9,0 8,0 8,0 8,5 7,5 7,5 8,0 7,5 8,0 8,0 8,0 Hi 8,5 8,5 8,5 9,5 1 2596,81 3 +1
    Extra 330SC SP-MTD 8,58 7,75 7,87 8,58 7,33 7,33 8,45 7,24 7,90 7,90 8,11 7,33 8,92 8,58 8,99   2547,59    
5 Wojciech KOTULSKI - Ż.A 8,5 8,5 7,5 7,0 7,0 8,0 8,5 7,5 8,0 8,5 7,0 6,5 7,5 7,5 6,5 0 2450,66 5
    Extra 330SC SP-IIN 8,16 8,16 7,33 7,17 6,78 7,87 8,92 7,24 7,90 8,55 7,17 7,05 7,98 7,64 6,50   2526,28    
    0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0   2
 
 Figure Anomalies Summary

Distribution of Raw Marks - Judge vs. Panel

          Judge   O/all    Proportion

 27 max None HZ AV 0.0 0.5 1.0 1.5 2.0 2.5 3.0 3.5 4.0 4.5 5.0 5.5 6.0 6.5 7.0 7.5 8.0 8.5 9.0 9.5 10.0
 Mark to CHZ - -  
 AV to CHZ - -  
 AV to Mark - -    
 HZ to Mark - -  
 Lo to Mark - 1  
 Hi to Mark 1 2  

 The 60% rule

 - -  

 
 This Judge and O/all totals for all Judges

 

   Judge 2 Raw Marks Panel Average after FPS
 
 Review of Anomalies
Mark anomalies   Judge 1 Judge 2 Judge 3 Judge 4 Ch.Judge 5 CHZ's
Maksym GRABARCZYK - WRO Fig-12 7,0 Hi 8,5 7,5 8,0 7,5 OK
  Extra 330SC SP-MTD   7,10 7,33 7,83 7,17 7,23  
 
Score anomalies (none)  
 
 Average and Spread of Marks
Judging style: Judge Panel 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 5.0 6.0 7.0 8.0 9.0 10.0 Judges average mark = 7,99, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1,11 Panel average mark = 7,97, mean spread of marks (2xSD) = 1,10
 
 Review of RI Contributions per Pilot
Pilots not ranked correctly Aeroplane Judge raw
Norm score		 Bias
Hi/Lo		 Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
rank		 Panel
rank		 Rank
diff		 RI value
per pilot		 Percent
of total		   RI contributions ranked
  by decreasing size
Maksym GRABARCZYK - WRO Extra 330SC 2596,81 -   2547,59 49,22     3     4     + 1     0,50 70,80%
Dariusz MAZUR - RAD Extra 330LX 2518,08 -   2566,12 48,04     4     3     - 1     0,21 29,20%
                  0,71    
Pilots ranked correctly   Judge
FPS score		   Panel
FPS score		 Score
difference		 Judge
FPS rank		 Panel
FPS rank		        
Maciej KULASZEWSKI - RAD Extra 300L 2695,29   2652,32 42,97     1     1            
Robert KOWALIK - RAD Extra 300L 2615,72   2600,83 14,89     2     2            
Wojciech KOTULSKI - Ż.A Extra 330SC 2450,66   2526,28 75,62     5     5            
 
 Summary of RI Contributions per Nation
Judge:

Max nation bias = 0,50

 Min = -0,21 Average = 0,15
Panel:

= 4,96

 = -4,99  = -0,01
 
Most favoured Least favoured Judge Avg RAD x 3 Ż.A x 1 WRO x 1 Ranking Index totals per nation Using the +/- rank differences to show national bias from the most to the least favoured teams.

Calculations by: FairPlay v2 (scoring CJ + CHZ Summary)
Aerobatic Contest Results Organiser, ACRO Version 5.2 Build: 25.06.26